Harvey is an enterprise legal AI platform used by more than 3,000 law firms and in house legal teams, including over 80 AmLaw 100 firms. It is built for large and mid sized firms and corporate legal departments that handle high stakes work and need strong security controls. Prices are not published and access starts with a demo, so most solos and small firms will get more value from tools with clear pricing.
What Harvey is
Harvey sells AI software for law firms and in house legal teams. It says the world's top law firms and legal departments trust it with their highest stakes work Harvey ↗.
The platform is a set of connected tools. Agents handle end to end legal tasks and route work to the right agent automatically Harvey ↗. Vault stores and analyzes large document sets Harvey ↗ Harvey Vault ↗. Knowledge researches legal, regulatory and tax questions Harvey ↗. Spaces are shared workspaces for firms, clients and co counsel, with ethical walls Harvey ↗. Other modules cover contract review and negotiation, regulatory change tracking, usage analytics, a mobile app and a memory feature that carries your preferences across the platform Harvey ↗.
Harvey says it has more than 3,000 customers and more than 200,000 professionals using it in over 70 countries Harvey ↗. Customers it names include A&O Shearman, Latham & Watkins, Reed Smith, Norton Rose Fulbright, KKR, Bayer and Procter & Gamble Harvey ↗. Hands on testing is in progress, and we will update this review with our results.
What it does well
It handles large document sets. Vault can store and organize up to 100,000 files per vault, including files and email correspondence Harvey Vault ↗. Review tables pull and compare key data points from thousands of documents at once, and you can ask questions over the table to summarize or compare Harvey Vault ↗.
It connects to where documents already live. Vault can sync from document management systems such as iManage, SharePoint and Google Drive Harvey Vault ↗.
Security is enterprise grade. Harvey lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001, along with SAML single sign on, audit logs, IP allow listing and data lifecycle management Harvey ↗. It also references GDPR and CCPA compliance Harvey ↗.
It is proven at the top of the market. More than 80 AmLaw 100 firms use it, according to Harvey Harvey ↗. Harvey reports an average of more than 25 hours saved per month Harvey ↗, though that is the company's own figure.
Collaboration with clients is built in. Spaces let a firm work with clients and co counsel in shared workspaces while keeping ethical walls in place Harvey ↗.
The company is well funded. Harvey announced it raised $550 million at a $15.5 billion valuation Harvey ↗, which suggests it will keep investing in the product.
Where it falls short
There is no public price. Neither the home page nor the pricing page lists plans, seat minimums or a trial. Both point you to a demo request Harvey ↗ Harvey pricing ↗.
It is not aimed at solos. Harvey's customer list is made up of large firms and corporations Harvey ↗, and smaller firms will likely find better value in tools with published prices.
Results still need checking. Every legal AI tool can produce errors. A Stanford study found that even research tools built on legal databases gave wrong information in a meaningful share of queries Stanford HAI study ↗, so lawyers must verify citations and conclusions themselves.
Outcome claims come from the vendor. The hours saved figure is Harvey's own Harvey ↗, and we found no independent measure of it.
Pricing and plans
Harvey does not publish prices. Its pricing page offers only a Request a Demo link Harvey pricing ↗, and the home page does the same Harvey ↗.
No free plan or self serve trial is listed Harvey ↗ Harvey pricing ↗. Expect a sales process and an enterprise contract.
For comparison, Paxton AI publishes its price at $499 per user a month or $2,999 a year with a 7 day free trial Paxton pricing ↗, and MyCase Pro, which includes an AI writing assistant, is $100 per user a month billed yearly MyCase pricing ↗.
Who should (and shouldn't) use it
- Good fit: large and mid sized law firms that review thousands of documents per matter.
- Good fit: corporate legal departments that need strict security controls and client collaboration spaces.
- Good fit: firms that already use iManage, SharePoint or Google Drive and want AI over those files.
- Skip it if: you are a solo or small firm that wants a published price and a quick start.
- Skip it if: you mainly need case law research with citations from a legal database. CoCounsel Legal fits better.
Alternatives worth a look
- CoCounsel Legal: our top pick, grounded in Westlaw and Practical Law with linked citations CoCounsel Legal ↗.
- MyCase: practice management with AI from $100 per user a month billed yearly and a 10 day free trial MyCase pricing ↗.
- Paxton AI: published pricing at $499 a month or $2,999 a year per user, with a 7 day trial Paxton pricing ↗.
- Spellbook: AI contract review and drafting inside Word, with a 7 day free trial Spellbook pricing ↗.
Where it appears
ComparedThe Best AI Tools for Lawyers at Small FirmsWhat’s good
- Used by 3,000+ legal organizations
- Many AmLaw 100 firms
- Enterprise security
What to know
- No published price
- Not aimed at solos
Key features
- Legal AI for litigation and transactional work
- Enterprise controls such as SSO and audit logs
Questions people ask
How much does Harvey AI cost?
Harvey does not publish prices. You need to request a demo to get a quote Harvey ↗ Harvey pricing ↗.
Does Harvey have a free trial?
No free trial or free plan is listed on its home or pricing pages Harvey ↗ Harvey pricing ↗.
Who uses Harvey?
Harvey says more than 3,000 law firms and in house teams, including over 80 AmLaw 100 firms, use it Harvey ↗.
Is Harvey good for small law firms?
It is built for bigger firms and legal departments Harvey ↗. Small firms will usually get more value from tools with published prices such as MyCase or Paxton AI Paxton pricing ↗ MyCase pricing ↗.
Where this comes from
Checked Oct 9, 2026. Vendor pages describe their own products; independent sources add outside views. Hands on testing is in progress.
01